Will "AI alignment researchers don't (seem to) stack
" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
1
5
Ṁ54Ṁ120
2025
20%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post AI alignment researchers don't (seem to) stack is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "AI Alignment Metastrategy" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Predictable updating about AI risk" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
59% chance
Will ""AI Alignment" is a Dangerously Overloaded Term" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Current AIs Provide Nearly No Data Relevant t..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
23% chance
Will "Alignment Implications of LLM Successes: a De..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will "OpenAI: Facts from a Weekend" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Without fundamental advances, misalignment an..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
48% chance
Will "Speaking to Congressional staffers about AI risk" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
25% chance
Will "AI #8: People Can Do Reasonable Things" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
7% chance