Will "Ability to solve long-horizon tasks correlate..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
0
Ṁ100resolved Feb 11
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Ability to solve long-horizon tasks correlates with wanting things in the behaviorist sense is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will "METR: Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
19% chance
Will "The Intelligence Curse" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Do confident short timelines make sense?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Short Timelines Don't Devalue Long Horizon Re..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "The Problem" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "Notes on the Long Tasks METR paper, from a HC..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "How I've run major projects" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Prioritizing Work" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "The "Length" of "Horizons"" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
8% chance
Will "Measuring no CoT math time horizon (single fo..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance