Resolves YES if I hear that @Austin said "Arson" out loud at least one time on May 17th. Otherwise, obviously NO. This market is open to manipulation!
In the rare event that Austin finds this market, he gets final say over resolution.
Warning: If you don't know why this market is a thing, don't bet no.
Apr 27, 6:25pm: Will Austin say "Arson" out loud at least once on May 17th? → Will Austin say "Arson" out loud at least once on May 17th? [Subsidized Ṁ100 LMAO]
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ10 | |
| 2 | Ṁ8 | |
| 3 | Ṁ7 | |
| 4 | Ṁ6 | |
| 5 | Ṁ3 |
@amzoeee "This market is open to manipulation!" Resolves NO if there is no evidence, though (word of mouth) (still no if he doesn't come and there is no evidence)
@KyleWan I should clarify - word of mouth from trustworthy sources is enough to resolve yes. My bad.
@ithildulin though i suppose if austin himself testifies that he said "arson" it would work too
@ithildulin as the proofnik ambassador, @Conflux has so much manipulative power fr.
Completely allowed though!
@KyleWan shouldnt he be neutral and not allowed to bet if hes the one making the decision
or idk
@amzoeee no he doesnt decide the resolution of this market. I'm just saying that he could probably get Austin to say arson or to not say arson.