If Non Human Intelligence (UAP) disclosure goes well, who will the UAP community believe provided the critical evidence that triggered official government acknowledgement of non-human intelligence?

This prediction is aimed at identifying the whistleblower, podcaster, journalist, public transparency advocate, team of advocates, or specific event that will be considered by the UAP community to have provided the specific evidence necessary to compel disclosure of non-human intelligence to the American public.

If public disclosure of non-human intelligence occurs, this prediction will resolve to the individual or event that receives the most votes on a poll that is taken within the UAP community that reads, "Which individual or event produced the critical piece or pieces of evidence that triggered public disclosure of non-human intelligence?".

The details of where the survey will be listed and who will have access to voting will be defined by Jesse Michels. More specifically, it will be a poll that is primarily aimed at his audience. It would be fair to say that this question will resolve to whomever or whatever Jesse's audience believes should be credited for compelling disclosure of non-human intelligence.

This prediction will only resolve if disclosure of non-human intelligence is officially acknowledged by the US government.

If the US government fails to acknowledge the existence of non-human intelligence, this prediction will resolve 'na' in 2050.