POLL: Should we remove being able to bet on your own free markets?

This is a poll. Please vote YES, NO or ABSTAIN in capital letters at the beginning of your post (you may post again to change your vote) This market will resolve to YES if a majority of voters vote YES, NO if a majority of voters vote no, and PROB 50% in case of a tie. The question was simplified for the title, the actual question is: Would it be a sufficient fix to the current problem to remove the ability to bet on your own free market. Please vote YES if all of: - You believe we should keep the current free market system - You believe we should remove the ability of free market creators to bet on their own markets (If you like the current free market system and would like for every market to disallow their authors to bet on them, also bet YES) Please vote NO if any of: - You believe we should get rid of the free market system - You want the author of a free market to be able to bet on it - You want restriction on free markets which do not include disallowing authors of free markets betting on them (Note: I'm opting for a resolution based on majority because I do not believe the volume of bets to be high enough for proportionality to make sense) Jun 13, 3:36am: Note: This is mostly about not being able to take profits from the free markets. If you support author betting on their own market but not being able to take any money from it, count this as a YES Jun 18, 9:30am: Bet policy: Abstain (except to bump the market by buying-reselling a dollar)

#	Name	Total profit
1		Ṁ20
2		Ṁ13
3		Ṁ6
4		Ṁ5
5		Ṁ2

🏅 Top traders

People are also trading

Related questions