
My Manifold Survey asks users to give their rankings of works in fourteen different categories of media. You can find markets on each of the categories, as well as the overall favorite, in the Manifold's favorites category.
Respondents can rank each work as "Excellent", "Good", "Okay", or "Bad", or they can respond that they haven't seen/read/etc. the work. The first four responses are converted into points as "Excellent" = 2, "Good" = 1, "Okay" = 0, "Bad" = -1. A work is divisive if there is a large variation in the scores people give it, specifically, if the standard deviation of the scores is large.
To judge the most divisive work, I will only consider works with at least ten rankings, since fewer than that is just too small of a sample size to trust the results. I will then calculate the sample standard deviation of the scores for each work. Note that this is not the same thing as the standard deviation - I am using the corrected sample standard deviation.
Also, note that only "Excellent", "Good", "Okay", and "Bad" count as scores. "Haven't seen/read/etc." isn't a score - it indicates the lack of a score and those responses are not included when calculating the sample standard deviation.
See Plasma's Manifold Survey for other questions about the survey.
The survey is officially out! You can take it here: https://forms.gle/xZqWVxuY5irgLigu9
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ23 | |
2 | Ṁ16 | |
3 | Ṁ14 | |
4 | Ṁ5 |
People are also trading
The most divisive work was Infinite Jest.
https://plasmabloggin.substack.com/p/survey-results-pt-3-manifolds-favorites
Question: How did people think this market would resolve? The intention was to resolve it to the most divisive work on the entire survey, meaning that if it isn't one of the ones here, it resolves "Other". But based on how low "Other" was at close, I wonder if that wasn't exactly clear. Were people expecting me to resolve it to the most divisive option listed on the market, rather than the most divisive overall?
@lag So does this mean you were betting under the same interpretation I had (i.e., that it would resolve "Other" if none of the ones listed were the most divisive)?
@JosephNoonan I think it should resolve "Other" in this case. I think people just didn't expect it to be an option that wasn't listed.
@JosephNoonan I also think it should resolve other to me. Otherwise, why is there even an 'other' option? The market was clear, if traders missed it it's their fault
The "Mr. Beat" option is meant to say "Mr. Beast". Coincidentally, Mr. Beat is also a YouTube channel (and a quite good one), but it wasn't on my survey.