![](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffirebasestorage.googleapis.com%2Fv0%2Fb%2Fmantic-markets.appspot.com%2Fo%2Fdream%252Fbp0JQo6CfC.png%3Falt%3Dmedia%26token%3D68fd055b-54c0-4f06-821b-14066463982e&w=3840&q=75)
On my upcoming survey, I will ask respondents to rate all the plays that are options here as either "Excellent", "Good", "Okay", "Bad", or "Haven't seen". This will only include submissions that I can verify are actually plays.
Each play will get a score based on the total number of points from each response. A rating of "Excellent" counts as 2 points, "Good" counts as 1, "Bad" counts as -1, and the other two options count as 0. The play that gets the highest total score wins. If multiple plays are tied for the best score, this will resolve to all of them equally.
See Plasma's Manifold Survey for other questions about the survey.
Edit: The survey is officially out! You can take it here: https://forms.gle/xZqWVxuY5irgLigu9
That also means new responses to this market won't be considered.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ28 | |
2 | Ṁ27 | |
3 | Ṁ22 | |
4 | Ṁ4 | |
5 | Ṁ0 |
@JosephNoonan are you going to do anything to prevent people from rigging results by submitting many entries? Sorry if already asked somewhere
(Commenting on a random market that won’t notify too many traders)
@EliLifland I guess you’d probably investigate any suspicious spikes toward specific answers, that might be good enough
@EliLifland It is just by Google account. Google forms doesn't have the ability to limit responses by IP address, or any other way except Google accounts (though even that would be easy to get around and vote a few times), so this is the best method I have to limit responses. If I see any suspicious activity that makes it look like one person may have responded multiple times, I'll investigate it, but otherwise, I am trusting people to be honest.