What percentage of US energy will be produced by each source in 2050?
29
214
1.2K
2051
20%
Solar
19%
Natural Gas
15%
Nuclear
14%
Petroleum
8%
Coal
7%
Wind
5%
Hydroelectric
5%
Biomass
3%
Fusion
3%
Geothermal
1.3%
Other

Data will come from an official source like https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/us-energy-facts/

Get Ṁ200 play money
Sort by:
bought Ṁ0 of Hydroelectric YES

buying hydro at 2% because it's currently 2.3% and the supply can only go up while total energy use probably goes down with efficiency improvements

bought Ṁ2 of Geothermal YES

@JonathanRay You expect US power consumption to go down by 2050?

What odds? I'd love to make a big bet (maybe roughly specified as "Will more electricity be utilized by intelligent agents in the current boundaries of the United States by 2050?").

post-singularity there would be a lot more fission or fusion so that's priced in here

@JonathanRay absent a singularity though, US energy consumption has been flat since 2003 and will probably remain flat or slightly decline due to efficiency improvements / population decline.

bought Ṁ0 of Coal YES

Coal is used not just for the electric grid, but also for industrial process heat and as a reducing agent in metal refining. There isn't any good alternative to metallurgical coal, but that's only 3% of US coal consumption https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/coal/use-of-coal.php

bought Ṁ0 of Coal YES

@JonathanRay in some cases, an electric arc furnace can substitute for coke

@JonathanRay electric arc furnaces are substantially (roughly ~10x) more efficient than blast furnaces on an energy-per-carbon atom basis (scope 1 emissions only, i.e. not accounting for grid mix emissions) but they actually still use sacrificial carbon electrodes (graphite or coal tar) that are consumed by the electric arc and produce CO2. Coal tar ultimately comes from coal and about ~50% of graphite is produced by graphitization (also from coal) -- the other ~50% of graphite is mined directly

bought Ṁ10 of Nuclear YES

@JonathanRay The title specifies "energy production" -- can you clarify if you're referring to primary energy production, US electric grid mix, or something else? Specifically, I'm curious how you intend to account for the ~60% of non-electric energy consumption from direct use of fuels -- e.g., would gas-powered internal combustion engine cars on the road count as "petroleum"? Would biomass-derived sustainable aviation fuel count as "biomass"?

I'm asking because, based on the preliminary investments, it seems very much to me like people are buying shares based on their understanding of the electric grid mix, which is only about a third of overall energy production.

bought Ṁ4 of Nuclear YES

@pyrylium Primary energy production. Yes. Yes.

bought Ṁ10 of Wind YES

folks really sleeping on how much of our renewable mix is hydropower

fun fact: for the last century+, the single largest power plant in the world (by nameplate capacity) has ALWAYS been a hydroelectric dam

(are we gonna build more dams in the US? unclear. but pumped hydro energy storage is pretty great... and 98% of US dams aren't electrified, according to the Water Power Technologies Office)

boughtṀ10Fusion YES
bought Ṁ10 of Fusion YES

@Joshua I moved the market a bit it seems.