data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bba8a/bba8a4a74007758b86d07a65ece01e3b31fd0be4" alt=""
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ25 | |
2 | Ṁ2 | |
3 | Ṁ2 |
Sort by:
@42irrationalist If you look through his comment history, it’s fairly obvious. “Jews did WTC”, “men will be psychically annihilated by peak oil” and improper market resolutions are the standouts. Just a big standard weirdo internet troll.
@firstuserhere Good question! I would say that admitting would be too subject to market manipulation. If an admin bans SockPuppetMark and states he believes they’re the same person, I would accept that. If someone claims to be Mark and gets banned afterwards but I don’t have other evidence to corroborate the claim, I would resolve it “no”.
@Dreamingpast Looks like he was banned for ban evasion, which seems like reasonable evidence that the mods consider it to be Mark. Guess this resolves yes.