Resolves YES if: Before 12:00 AM ET January 1, 2027, any U.S. federal court issues an order enjoining enforcement of, or declaring unenforceable, in whole or in substantial part, at least one of these five statutes: (1) Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205, as amended/replaced by SB 26-189), (2) California SB 53 (Transparency in Frontier AI Act), (3) New York RAISE Act, (4) Texas TRAIGA, (5) Illinois HB 3773.

Terms:

• Counts: preliminary injunction, permanent injunction, TRO, or declaratory judgment of unconstitutionality/preemption, from any federal district or appellate court, in any case (xAI v. Weiser, a DOJ Task Force suit, or a new industry/trade-group suit).

• “Substantial part” = the order blocks at least one core operative obligation (e.g., the algorithmic-discrimination duties, frontier transparency/reporting requirements), not merely a severable ancillary provision like a notice formatting rule. Resolver judgment on edge cases, stated in advance.

• Does NOT count: stays pending appeal of a state’s own enforcement, voluntary non-enforcement agreements, state legislative repeal/delay, or rulings on standing/venue without merits relief.

• Order counts even if later stayed or reversed after the deadline.

• Resolution source: PACER filings or reporting from two major outlets.