Within a year from the end of October, will consensus among experts (astronomers and physicists trivially, but possibly expanding to include other forms of expert depending on what properties 3I/ATLAS displays) be that 3I/ATLAS constitutes a techno signature? Does not have to entail it being a probe, a vessel, or a weapon; could be something obtuse like "Composition of comet is entirely inconsistent with any known explanation not involving technology... [12 pages of academic writing]"