Elon Musk, leading President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, has implemented a new policy where all federal employees must email a summary of their weekly accomplishments. Failure to comply by the specified deadline, Monday at 11:59 PM EST, will result in their resignation. This measure aims to increase accountability but has raised concerns regarding logistics, privacy, and constitutionality.
Update 2025-02-24 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): News Source Criteria for Resolution:
At least one credible news report must attribute the job losses to the reporting demand policy. Only evidence from the following organizations will be considered:
ABC
CBS
NBC
PBS
NPR
CNN
Fox
MSNBC
Associated Press
New York Times
Washington Examiner
Wall Street Journal
New York Post
USA Today
1,000People are also trading
There have been significant staff reductions, however, it's difficult to attribute these directly to the reporting requirements:
ABC News reported over 200,000 federal workers’ roles were eliminated, with 10,000+ USAID staffers on leave, but linked these to DOGE’s overall efforts, not the reporting requirement.
Associated Press noted 75,000 buyouts and widespread probationary employee layoffs (220,000 with less than a year of service as of March 2024) but didn’t tie these to the reporting mandate.
CNN described arbitrary firings and the reporting email’s confusion but didn’t quantify job losses specifically from it.
New York Times reported plans for large-scale reductions (e.g., 7,000 at USAID, 7,000 at IRS) but didn’t connect these to the reporting requirement.
PBS mentioned over 30,000 firings and a new reporting email but didn’t claim it caused 10,000+ losses.
NPR covered 21 DOGE resignations protesting the agency’s direction but didn’t link mass layoffs to the reporting rule.
Fox Business estimated 100,000 layoffs or buyouts, with 216,215 announced in March 2025, but attributed these to DOGE’s broader cuts, not the reporting requirement.
How tight does the causal link have to be?
I find it difficult to believe that a non-response will be treated as an immediate resignation, but not difficult to believe that some of those who do not respond may face a hostile work environment that makes them more likely to decide to quit. Even without something that could be challenged as a hostile work environment, I expect there will be a lot of constructive dismissal going on.
@equinoxhq Fair question. Let's go on news reports of the cause of job losses from at least one of the following organizations:
• ABC
• CBS
• NBC
• PBS
• NPR
• CNN
• Fox
• MSNBC
• Associated Press
• New York Times
• Washington Examiner
• Wall Street Journal
• New York Post
• USA Today
I think it's a likely yes but I can't sem to find exact numbers anywhere, especially totals.