Manifold Team April Retro: What could have gone better?
17
174
475
resolved May 9
29%25%
Announcement for pivot was unnecessarily rushed / not communicated well (e.g. only 1 week for charity).
12%10%
Phone verification lost a lot of new users
12%8%
Too many outages
7%6%
DAU declining the most it ever has and we haven't even discussed it much
7%6%
Daily comments trending down
7%6%
Figured out weekly emails were not being sent for months and fixed
6%7%
Didn't confer with Austin about revaluation
6%5%
SEO neglected
4%4%
500 errors for vercel revalidation not fixed
4%3%
Still churning through approaches for realtime
3%3%
Txns migration delayed
2%1.7%
More social media content
1%0.8%
FUH as mod
0.1%
Not pivoting
5%
More effort to maintain the Youtuber/Jason/Stonks people
9%Other

Where did we drop the ball? The point of this isn't to point fingers or assign blame, but rather to identify where our processes and strategy are not serving us well.

I will resolve the market to a rough approximation of what I think actually didn't go well. Place your bets!

Last time: https://manifold.markets/JamesGrugett/manifold-team-march-retro-what-coul

Get Ṁ600 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ58
2Ṁ4
3Ṁ3
4Ṁ3
5Ṁ3
Sort by:

Didn't realize the meeting time changed, sad to have missed this one! One thing I would have brought up is that number of comments are trending down:

The site is better when people are talking to each other! It keeps people coming back every day to continue the conversation, and it inspires new market creation and betting when people find disagreement.

Our comments are one of our main advantages against real money markets!

It's hard to notice when number of comments per day slowly decreases, particularly when this graph is a bit buried in the stats page. I think we could have done better in noticing this and trying to counteract it.

IIRC there was at some point an idea to have a daily quest to leave a comment, did that ever get tested? Now might be a good time.

More effort to maintain the Youtuber/Jason/Stonks people

one of the most important/underrated skill in startups is choosing what not to build.
the truth is that the product they wanted is not the one we had, and they could execute much faster than us by building their own thing exactly good for their use case. we need to give up on thousands of dollars to be able to get millions.

More social media content
bought Ṁ5 More social media co... NO

i feel like we don't have a clear and compelling message for people until flumba is live. we already have a lot of publicity. i feel like this basically doesn't matter

@Sinclair yeah I don't think it matters that much right now either. Will double down on it once sweepstakes actually launch (and leading up to build hype).

Just to make sure, we're betting on what you think could have been done better? Does this mean the answers are an exhaustive list, and that adding further answers, or indeed betting on Other, is moot?

@GazDownright Yes, and new answers are welcome!

This is mostly an exercise for the Manifold Team, and it will be resolved soon according to my own subjective judgment.