July Retro: What could have gone better?
12
740Ṁ130resolved Aug 3
ResolvedN/A
19%Other
17%
In-person recruitment didn't present a compelling use case
12%
Unclear whether we're supposed to be focusing on growth, fixes, or Manifund
12%
Market mechanisms still bad: DPM on FR, and MCM, and Numeric markets being capital inefficient
9%
Continuing lack of user growth
8%
failure to prioritize new user experience
8%
Should have created growth plan earlier
6%
No big wins
3%
slashing balances of matching IP address accounts
3%
Groups chat and other use cases not fully worked out
2%
Pool values are a worse proxy for liquidity in a world with limit orders
1.6%
Figuring out a standup time that includes everyone
Where did we drop the ball? The point of this isn't to point fingers or assign blame, but rather to identify where our processes and strategy are not serving us well.
Mostly, this market is for the Manifold team; don't expect the probabilities, etc to mean much other than like a subjective vote on how much you agree with a particular statement, or how much you want to discuss it.
Last time: https://manifold.markets/Austin/june-30-cycle-retro-what-could-have
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000