In order to count as "significant controversy", it must seem like 5+ people strongly feel it was an incorrect resolution and/or don't want to bet in their future markets.
Only counts future issues, not any that have already occurred prior to this market's creation.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ716 | |
| 2 | Ṁ102 | |
| 3 | Ṁ97 | |
| 4 | Ṁ85 | |
| 5 | Ṁ72 |
@IsaacKing There was only like ~a month after this question was created, until Gigacasting stopped resolving markets, probably has something to do with it?
I did try to look for a little bit while this was still open.
god that was more time than I planned to spend reading resolved gigacasting markets, but I went through all of his markets created between Jacks comment and when he stopped resolving. None appeared to have significant controversy. barring something like him coming back simply to resolve a market and profit here, I expect this to resolve no.
@IsaacKing How will this market resolve if one of Gigacasting's markets engenders significant controversy before the end of 2023, but then that market becomes uncontroversial before the end of 2023 and is uncontroversial at the end of 2023?