My attempts to get DALL-E 2 to draw very simple shapes went... poorly.
(https://outsidetheasylum.blog/testing-dall-e-2-mathematics-comprehension/)
When this market closes, I'll test out the most advanced image-generation models that I was able to get access to. If there are multiple, I'll try them all.
If any of them can consistently return a pentagon from the description "a pentagon", a heptagon from the description "a heptagon", and similar, I'll resolve to YES. If they need a bit of nudging like specific prompt wording but can still generalize correctly to any polygon, that'll be good enough to resolve YES. Otherwise I'll resolve NO.
A model that was trained specifically to make geometric shapes doesn't count; it has to be a generalist like DALL-E 2. In order for a new model to qualify for this market, it needs to be no worse than DALL-E 2 at the vast majority of things it's asked to draw.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ298 | |
| 2 | Ṁ194 | |
| 3 | Ṁ134 | |
| 4 | Ṁ117 | |
| 5 | Ṁ116 |