The typo is located at https://docs.manifold.markets/faq#what-does-resolving-to-na-do
Resolved as 'yes' if, after the given time, after going to the Manifold About page, clicking on "FAQ", and searching for 'expectationt', there are 0 results.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ419 | |
| 2 | Ṁ101 | |
| 3 | Ṁ69 | |
| 4 | Ṁ47 | |
| 5 | Ṁ44 |
People are also trading
If I had known Manifold was open source when I made this poll (which is obvious to anyone who thinks about it for more than a moment, but, alas, I did not) I would have made the deadline a day/week from now instead of 2 months, since that would be more interesting.
The above mistake, my curiosity, and the fact that I have 1 datapoint supporting the belief that the FAQ has more than 1 typo all motivated me to run it through a spellchecker. That belief was right:
overshooting -> overshoot
come -> comes (the first usage of the word 'come' in the document)
recieve -> receive
compy -> comply
Markets -> market (second bullet point under How does resolving markets work?)
and of course,
expectationt -> expectation
I'll try to PR a fix to these typos after resolution. I won't make another typo market because I already did that.
@Interrobang https://github.com/manifoldmarkets/manifold/pull/2649
I believe I fixed most/all of the ones you listed. I might have left 1 or 2 if they looked ok and read well.