1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ545 | |
| 2 | Ṁ517 | |
| 3 | Ṁ99 | |
| 4 | Ṁ60 | |
| 5 | Ṁ59 |
People are also trading
⚠Deleted Creator
📢Resolved to NO
PROOF PER CLUB STATEMENT
Admittedly read this too quick. And ownership stake is not completed, just "in agreement".
@Predictor as mentioned, although there has been an agreement between the relevant parties, Ratcliffe won't become an owner until some formalities have completed, very likely in the new year. This will resolve NO. The creator is also inactive, so this will be resolved by a moderator.
You'll see headlines in the new year when it becomes official I'm sure.
The question is about ownership, not the agreement. Ownership requires the formalities to have completed.
There is an agreement, but it is yet to be made official. Ratcliffe does not presently officially own any of Manchester United, and it looks like he won't until the new year
Manchester United announces deal to sell up to 25% of EPL club to UK billionaire Jim Ratcliffe
[...]
United’s statement noted the deal was still “subject to customary regulatory approvals” which is expected to take some time. The process must be ratified by the Premier League and also an official announcement made via the New York Stock Exchange.
https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2023/12/22/manchester-united-jim-ratcliffe.aspx
Ratcliffe in final negotiations to buy 25% of ManU
[...] even if concluded on Friday, it will be "weeks into the new year before it can be fully ratified by the Premier League and other regulators."
Not going to be official this year.