
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ3,507 | |
2 | Ṁ1,452 | |
3 | Ṁ767 | |
4 | Ṁ290 | |
5 | Ṁ220 |
People are also trading
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/03/sam-bankman-fried-trial-ftx-crypto
During the morning session, the U.S. government said there were no discussions of a plea deal and that no such offers had been given.
I think the answer is NO
I quickly googled Bernie Madoff, Elizabeth Holmes, Trevor Milton, and Kenneth Lay. I found no evidence that any of them was ever offered a plea deal. So 89% seems too high. My reference class is closer to the issue at hand than "all federal cases" or "all federal fraud cases" and I think that matters a lot more than sample size.
@JonathanRay It may be closer but comparatively it falls prey to the law of small numbers.
@NicoDelon For n=4 and p=0.89 the binomial probability was 0.00015. That's plenty of sample size to bet NO
@mr22222222 Exactly. No one should make inferences, much less expensive ones, based on n=4 samples.
@NicoDelon I'm anticipating that the Feds will make a deal involving his parents. SBF makes a deal and one part of the quid pro quo is that his parents don't do any time.
Also, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because you can't find any evidence of a deal being offered doesn't mean that a deal wasn't offered.
I suspect that if the Feds offer SBF a deal, he will mention it in one of the several interviews he does each day on YouTube.
@mr22222222 Other defendants in my reference class didn’t give interviews on YouTube so I don’t think it’ll happen 😉
@JonathanRay Maybe, maybe not. I don’t have access to what the prosecution knows. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/12/technology/sbf-parents-ftx-collapse.html
@mr22222222 Yup. That’s one of those weird markets where I realize a lot more people than I thought understand much less than I thought.
@NicoDelon The only way to rationalize buying NO at 10% or greater is if you think the feds are going to make an example out of SBF with a trial. It doesn't seem likely. Most federal prosecutors are terrified of losing a jury case.
"He could get off easier if he is offered and chooses to accept a plea deal from prosecutors, but even such a deal would almost certainly involve many years of prison time. A plea deal would normally be quite likely, but there are two headwinds here. First, Bankman-Fried appears to be in a self-induced state of delusion; specifically, he seems to think he really did nothing wrong. That may lead him to pursue a jury trial instead of a deal, which is certainly what I’d love to see, too.
But there’s also no guarantee that Justice will offer a plea deal. It’s common for even very serious crimes, but public outrage about FTX has been so intense that the Biden administration could conceivably push for a high-profile prosecution to appease a furious public."
I still think it should be higher given how high the base rate is.
@NicoDelon +1. The deal may not be worth taking, and we may not know it, but I think it’s overwhelmingly likely that he will be offered one at some point.
@Radicalia One question is whether Wang and Ellison taking guilty pleas makes it less likely that SBF will. But it’s still much more efficient for the prosecution to have a deal than go to trial. Unless they really want to put on a show I don’t see why they wouldn’t at least put a deal on the table. The deal might be 10 years in prison for all we know. That’s still a deal.