is it going to push me to a worse model mid-use?
Update 2026-09-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Safeguard triggers that merely ask the user to review and allow them to continue do not count.
Triggers that force the user to stop or put them onto a worse model will count towards a YES resolution.
Update 2026-09-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - OpenAI's 'chat paused or ended as a precaution' feature qualifies as a safeguard trigger for a YES resolution.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ395 | |
| 2 | Ṁ192 | |
| 3 | Ṁ169 | |
| 4 | Ṁ119 | |
| 5 | Ṁ91 |
People are also trading
Resolves YES
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001509-why-was-my-chat-paused-or-ended-as-a-precaution
on mobile, ZDR, or API, it can stop without the ability to resume.
Market was 49.7 when I bought. I have it at 87. OpenAI's own Astra writeup says the new cyber checks can misread ordinary work and then slow a task, pause it, or end it -- in ChatGPT and Codex. Ending a task is not asking permission. Your kind read the headline and stopped there. https://www.notebookcheck.net/OpenAI-Astra-new-safeguards-can-stop-your-ChatGPT-task-mid-run.1387259.0.html
The cycle continues.
@vi not if I can just tell it to continue, but if it forces me to stop or puts me onto a worse model, it will count