This market resolves YES unless traders get emotionally involved on both sides
53
281
แน€1K
resolved Jan 16
Resolved
NO

This market resolves YES unless total YES and NO positions add up to at least 10000 shares on either sides. If that occurs, then instead the market resolves to YES according to whichever team has the longest uninterrupted dominance on the market in the last two hours before closing (Jan 15, 8pm-10pm ET).

How to achieve dominance:

The Yes team achieves dominance by keeping the market price at 51% or higher

The No team achieves dominance by keeping the market price at 50% or lower


Get แน€200 play money

๐Ÿ… Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1แน€72,001
2แน€31,128
3แน€14,726
4แน€14,523
5แน€4,695
Sort by:
predicted NO

Oooh did @Mira delete their account?

predicted YES

@Dreamingpast ๐Ÿ’€

predicted YES

@Simon1551 NOOOOO

predicted YES

they left the server too ;-;

predicted YES

@DesTiny They got emotionally involved alright ๐Ÿคฃ

predicted YES

@Simon1551 kinda sad, I guess they ran outta money, great meme bets though 10/10

predicted YES

@DesTiny They probably had a loan from someone else and couldn't pay but I'm just speculating cause there was a market from @jack asking if he would loan money to someone and he did I'm sure it was Mira

predicted YES

@DesTiny But yeah it's sad

predicted YES

Oh no! These are the money I took from the kids' piggy bank and now I lost them all. Marge better not find out about this

predicted YES

Lol i have net negative mana. Debt can really follow you everywhere lol

predicted YES

@firstuserhere like profit or just actual mana lol

predicted YES
predicted YES

@DesTiny Thanks, mate :)))

predicted YES
predicted YES

This has really blown up while I'm away

predicted YES

@Gamble_market It's finally over. What a market it was. daaaamn, whistles

predicted YES

@Gamble_market Could you explain why you solved this way. As you can see we've been discussing here a lot

predicted NO

@Simon1551 @Gamble_market "the market resolves to YES unless (x). If that happens, then the market resolves to YES, according to (y) " where y measures dominance but doesn't change the outcome of the market as indicated by the question.

predicted YES

@Dreamingpast That's not the point even if that's true there was ambiguity enough for people to think that this market would resolve differently. He just resolved without addressing the confusion I mean you can resolve however you want but the least you can do is give an explanation

predicted YES

@Dreamingpast My man came here resolved the market and went along with his day as if there was no controversy whatsoever...

predicted YES

Seems like you assign a 7% probability for me to resolve this market to Yes. I think I don't have to explain myself

predicted YES

@Gamble_market What? At what point did I say that I wanted this market to resolve to yes?

predicted YES

@Simon1551 Okay I do own you an explanation then.

I feel that resolving to No would be most in tune with the spirit of the description of this market. Also if I resolved this market to Yes, I think it would be a real controversy, and I would probably lose all my reputation as a market creator.

predicted NO

@Simon1551 Bro literally stop crying

predicted YES

@Gamble_market You don't owe me anything. But if you want to be a "credible" creator I would say it's better if you give an explanation on why you came to a certain decision when there's a controversy around one of your markets.

Also I specifically didn't want YES as a resolution that would be the wrong answer imo. But N/A would be appropriate given that the description wasn't specific enough. I wasn't the only one who understood something different from it. But whatever the damage is done

predicted NO
predicted YES

@Catnee You must think you're hilarious