This market resolves YES unless traders get emotionally involved on both sides
53
1kṀ320k
resolved Jan 16
Resolved
NO

This market resolves YES unless total YES and NO positions add up to at least 10000 shares on either sides. If that occurs, then instead the market resolves to YES according to whichever team has the longest uninterrupted dominance on the market in the last two hours before closing (Jan 15, 8pm-10pm ET).

How to achieve dominance:

The Yes team achieves dominance by keeping the market price at 51% or higher

The No team achieves dominance by keeping the market price at 50% or lower


Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ72,001
2Ṁ31,128
3Ṁ14,726
4Ṁ14,523
5Ṁ4,695
Sort by:
predictedNO

Oooh did @Mira delete their account?

predictedYES
predictedYES

@Simon1551 NOOOOO

predictedYES

they left the server too ;-;

predictedYES

@DesTiny They got emotionally involved alright 🤣

predictedYES

@Simon1551 kinda sad, I guess they ran outta money, great meme bets though 10/10

predictedYES

@DesTiny They probably had a loan from someone else and couldn't pay but I'm just speculating cause there was a market from @jack asking if he would loan money to someone and he did I'm sure it was Mira

predictedYES

@DesTiny But yeah it's sad

predictedYES

Oh no! These are the money I took from the kids' piggy bank and now I lost them all. Marge better not find out about this

predictedYES

Lol i have net negative mana. Debt can really follow you everywhere lol

predictedYES

@firstuserhere like profit or just actual mana lol

predictedYES
predictedYES

@DesTiny Thanks, mate :)))

predictedYES
predictedYES

This has really blown up while I'm away

predictedYES

@Gamble_market It's finally over. What a market it was. daaaamn, whistles

predictedYES

@Gamble_market Could you explain why you solved this way. As you can see we've been discussing here a lot

predictedNO

@Simon1551 @Gamble_market "the market resolves to YES unless (x). If that happens, then the market resolves to YES, according to (y) " where y measures dominance but doesn't change the outcome of the market as indicated by the question.

predictedYES

@Dreamingpast That's not the point even if that's true there was ambiguity enough for people to think that this market would resolve differently. He just resolved without addressing the confusion I mean you can resolve however you want but the least you can do is give an explanation

predictedYES

@Dreamingpast My man came here resolved the market and went along with his day as if there was no controversy whatsoever...

predictedYES

Seems like you assign a 7% probability for me to resolve this market to Yes. I think I don't have to explain myself

predictedYES

@Gamble_market What? At what point did I say that I wanted this market to resolve to yes?

predictedYES

@Simon1551 Okay I do own you an explanation then.

I feel that resolving to No would be most in tune with the spirit of the description of this market. Also if I resolved this market to Yes, I think it would be a real controversy, and I would probably lose all my reputation as a market creator.

predictedNO

@Simon1551 Bro literally stop crying

predictedYES

@Gamble_market You don't owe me anything. But if you want to be a "credible" creator I would say it's better if you give an explanation on why you came to a certain decision when there's a controversy around one of your markets.

Also I specifically didn't want YES as a resolution that would be the wrong answer imo. But N/A would be appropriate given that the description wasn't specific enough. I wasn't the only one who understood something different from it. But whatever the damage is done

predictedNO
predictedYES

@Catnee You must think you're hilarious

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules