After the end of September I will go through the top ten answers and resolve to whichever article seems worst on the 30th of September midnight CEST.
I will try to judge in the prirorty of: first factual errors, if tied then presentation/style/grammer/typos, if tied then amount of information, N/A if still tied.
I will read the articles and arguments in the comment for why an article is/isn't the worst and supporting evience which is linked but will otherwise probalby not do my own research.
Only articles from the English Wikipedia are admisable.
If an article is vandalized on the the 30th CEST I will look at the last non-vandalized version.
This is an experiment in using prediction markets for quality assurance. Market manipulation through improving Wikipedia encouraged.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ216 | |
| 2 | Ṁ35 |
People are also trading
@oh Gendarmenmarkt I picked because I remembered that I had stumbled over the claim that it means men-at-arms market in German (which is only true for the 'enmarkt' part as 'gendarm' is french). The other two I picked by clicking on the 'random article' link.