Which riders will be announced for Movistar Team for the 2025 season?
6
575Ṁ1736
resolved Dec 31
Resolved
YES
Nairo Quintana
Resolved
YES
Fernando Gaviria
Resolved
YES
Davide Cimolai
Resolved
YES
Albert Torres
Resolved
YES
Enric Mas
Resolved
YES
Einer Rubio
Resolved
YES
Davide Formolo
Resolved
NO
Oier Lazkano
Resolved
NO
Alex Aranburu
Resolved
NO
Johan Jacobs
Resolved
NO
Alejandro Valverde
Resolved
NO
Ivan Sosa
Resolved
NO
Sergio Samitier
Resolved
NO
Vinicius Rangel
Resolved
NO
Remi Cavagna

Basic question: Which riders will be announced as riders for the 2025 season with Movistar Team?

ANNOUNCED. Not signed. Not "wait til they actually ride". This resolves on announcements.

If the team merges, changes sponsor, whatever, this probably still covers the new team. If it is obvious that it should not cover the new team, we can talk about what to do then. If they cease to exist, things will probably resolve No instead of N/A.

For riders on the 2024 roster:

If the team announces an extension publicly for the 2025 season (or longer), resolves Yes promptly. If it is common knowledge that they will ride for the team or have a 2025 contract, that is not enough to resolve yes. It has to be an announcement of a new, longer contract. Example: If Kooij announces an extension to 2027, he resolves Yes promptly.

If a different team announces a signing for 2025, resolves No promptly.

If there is no announcement about 2025, we're going to wait until the UCI website or team otherwise confirms they are on the 2025 squad.


For riders not on the 2024 roster (transfers in):

Resolves Yes if the team announces a signing. Resolves No if some other team announces a signing.

If there is an announcement that would lead to a prompt Yes or No resolution, but there is doubt about the claim or people are unsure of it for some reason, we can wait until it is more clear, even as long as the UCI website or official team roster for 2025. Example: Team accidentally announces on social media then immediately retracts --> Don't resolve yet. Example: Visma claims they signed Cian and Bora immediately counter-claims he's still for them --> Don't resolve yet. (If it resolves before the report is retracted, then a new answer can be created but it will not be unresolved.)

If some rider resolves Yes or No based on the criteria, and then new info comes out that puts that rider in question again, we can add a new option for that player, but we are not going to re-resolve or unresolve the earlier one. For example, if we had resolved Cian Yes for Bora 2024, and then there was word he might be leaving, we would not unresolve that, we would create a new answer for Cian.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ16
2Ṁ10
3Ṁ1
Sort by:

@Eliza Only a 2% chance of pulling an AvdB?!!? Boring.

bought Ṁ0 NO

Did you hear about the drama on this one? Apparently he was agreed all but done with Arkea and the Evil Agent re-shopped him for more money and they're now RAGING MAD because he was going to be their big signing.

No, I don't care for Aranburu. I think he's pretty overrated and probably too expensive anyways (I don't have any idea what kind of money he is on, but I believe it's too much.) I don't think he should be considered as the big signing for any team, not even a conti team.

bought Ṁ10 NO

Ciro claims he's considering other teams, including Bora.

Why so low 😭

(Gravel team does not count, it has to be the UCI road team)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.•Terms•Privacy