Will resolve opposite to the first bot to trade here. Unless of course someone moves the needle as fast as a bot, In which case, they will be robbed.
1,000@mods The market creator falsely resolved this market N/A after the criteria for YES were clearly met in order to avoid losing the liquidity mana. They were trying to steal from bots but didn't think it through and lost mana themselves, and then didn't want to play by the rules. According to their explicit criteria it should resolve YES because the first bot bought NO.
Also note that the market description was changed to say humans "will be robbed" only after humans traded against the creator's expectations.
@vi By losing the liquidity to me trading immediately after the bot. I feel a little bad but it was totally fair.
@Echidna I'm sorry but you have to resolve YES according to your criteria. You can't change it (which we can see in the history) just because someone else made mana trading fairly on it.
