What distinguishes sweepstakes from illegal gambling?
8%
1. A house edge
8%
2. A house edge that covers more than costs
8%
3. Random allocation of position
21%
Combination of 1 & 3
8%
Combination of 2 & 3
8%
6. Some other factor - please comment
8%
Combination of 6 & (1 or 2 and/or 3)
22%
8. There is no difference.
8%
Other

What happen to this site should be the primary guide to what answer or answers should be selected as correct.

This will run for a while 2030 close date is nominal and could easily be much different.:

If it is known that manifold will close then best judgement should be used by me prior to closure.
If manifold announce they have been cleared to do what they are doing with this "sweepstake" model then it can be resolved likely as "There is no difference."
If they have to make changes so there are no fees on sweepstake markets that will be strong indicator that it should close as "A house edge"
and so on.

In "Molly's Game", Molly was not only charged but racketeering provisions were also invoked. It was implied that this was because the game was "not fair" when she took a percentage of a few pots. She was making money so I have split first two options to distinguish between a house edge for purpose of making money versus just to cover costs which perhaps could be an important distinction.

I am mainly doing this to see discussion of what is a sweepstake and how, if at all, it differs from gambling and illegal gambling. I'll start:

I think, in a sweepstake, after paying a stake you are randomly allocated a gambling position. You can choose to pay more and get more positions. The difference to my mind is that in gambling you can research what position to take up and this can lead to more and more time spent in an addictive habit that you will figure out how to be better.

This difference seems to me to be a likely reason why there is a sweepstake exception to gambling rules in some locations.

So what are others thoughts and is this site pushing sweepstakes exception somewhat or to the limit or beyond those limits?

Please do comment with your thoughts.

I wasn't going to bet on this, but forgot and did a couple. I'll try to remember not to do so again.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money
Sort by:

My understanding is that in "sweepstakes", one does not actually need to put in money to participate, which is the legally relevant point.

@UnspecifiedPerson Interesting. To me the "stakes" part of sweepstakes means you, at least typically, do have to put money in to create a prize pool to distribute to winners.

It could easily be a legally relevant point for manifold.

A sweepstake is a method of gambling in which each person pays a small amount of money and is given the name of a competitor before a race or contest. The person who has the name of the winner receives all the money.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/sweepstake#:~:text=(swi%CB%90pste%C9%AAk%20),winner%20receives%20all%20the%20money.

How would you participate without putting in money?

The "all" maybe important. Personally if 50% goes to holder of 1st place 30% to holder of 2nd place 18% to holder of 3rd place and 2% to cover costs and competitors allocated randomly then I would call it a sweepstakes but I suspect that it may not qualify for sweepstake exemption because not all the money is redistributed.