
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ2,913 | |
2 | Ṁ1,803 | |
3 | Ṁ915 | |
4 | Ṁ718 | |
5 | Ṁ562 |
People are also trading
I can't get over how BAD of a pick Buttigieg would be. He's like the perfect Bad Pick. Not only is he wildly boring and unlikely to pick up a swing state for the election, Republicans can already point to one of the major policy failures they've already been pointing at: he East Palestine train derailment. They can even make it VP related if they make it about how Pete failed to get Biden to pay major attention to it for such a long time (regardless of how able he'd have been or how true anything they're saying is).
@Paatrick if I were the Democratic establishment trying to win Michigan and Minnesota I'd steer clear of a Jewish candidate.
I'd imagine they don't consider that validating incoming options is ɪ ᴍ ᴘ ᴀ ᴄ ᴛ ғ ᴜ ʟ
Fair enough. I just probably wouldn’t describe this as a conditional market at all then. It’s a normal market where one of the outcomes is “not condition X”.
Btw, is there a link to this recent policy? I looked around the FAQ and stuff but couldn’t find anything that suggested they were discouraging clearly articulated conditions where the market would resolve as N/A.