https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-7466.html
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/glossip-v-oklahoma-2/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Glossip
YES: The US Supreme Court's decision in Glossip v. Oklahoma does not vacate Glossip's guilty verdict or order a retrial and allow the state of Oklahoma to carry out his execution. Regardless of whether the state of Oklahoma actually carries out his execution.
NO: The US Supreme Court's decision in Glossip v. Oklahoma vacate Glossip's guilty verdict, order a retrial, or otherwise prevent his execution from being carried out. A delay in execution does not count.
N/A: The decision is unknown, the court fails to render an opinion, or the case becomes moot.
1,000
3.00Can't say what'll happen at the SC, but note that Glossip is guilty. Ignore what the media says, and read the judge's decision:
"The State presented an enormous amount of evidence that Glossip concealed Van Treese's body from investigators all day long and he lied about the broken window. He admitted knowing that Sneed killed Van Treese in room 102. He knew about the broken glass. However, he never told anyone that he thought Sneed was involved in the murder, until after he was taken into custody that night, after Van Treese's body was found. Glossip intentionally lied by telling people that Van Treese had left early that morning to get supplies. In fact, Van Treese was killed hours before Glossip claimed to have seen Van Treese that morning. Glossip's stories about when he last saw Van Treese were inconsistent. He first said that he last saw him at 7:00 a.m.; later he said he saw him at 4:30 a.m. Finally, he said he last saw him at 8:00 p.m. the night before Van Treese's death, and he denied making other statements regarding the time he last saw Van Treese."
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2141767757833512191&hl=en&as_sdt=2006