Richard Hanania is a contrarian blogger, many of whose opinions, especially on gender, I would characterize as right-wing. Recently he has surprised me with a number of more left-leaning articles, for example:
https://richardhanania.substack.com/p/why-the-media-is-honest-and-good
The underlying reason seems to be that RH is fundamentally a contrarian. He is surrounded by more right-wingers now than he used to be, so he finds himself disagreeing with them.
Nonetheless, RH's opinions on gender issues seem very, very un-left. (I hesitate even to say "traditional" -- it's hard to imagine writing like this from the pre-1960s West, or China at any time in its history...) Will he change his mind?
Resolution criteria: This is entirely subjective. When RH posts on gender I will try to determine if I feel it leans more left or right; if any one gender article this year leans more left on balance, I will resolve YES, otherwise NO. Since this is subjective, feel free to try to persuade me in the comments.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ662 | |
| 2 | Ṁ467 | |
| 3 | Ṁ227 | |
| 4 | Ṁ56 | |
| 5 | Ṁ50 |