Will the next OpenAI model have a stupid fucking name? [Must be plus-tier accessible]
217
1kṀ47k
Jun 26
57%
chance

Will the next openAI model available on chatgpt.com have a stupid fucking name?


Existing models available:
GPT-4o

o3

o4-mini

o4-mini-high

GPT-4.5

GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1-mini

Will the next model have a stupid fucking name?

Potential stupid fucking names:

GPT-4.6-mini
o4-mini-super

GPT-MAX

Names I don't consider stupid:

o5

GPT-5


I will not be betting on this market. I will extend if no new models show up. If multiple models are released at the same time, I will resolve NA.

Plus tier accessible models only.

  • Update 2025-06-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated that o3-pro is considered a stupid fucking name.

  • Update 2025-06-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated that GPT-25 is considered a stupid fucking name.

  • Update 2025-06-10 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated they will resolve based on a new model appearing on their own ChatGPT.com Plus tier account.

  • Update 2025-06-10 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator clarified the market's N/A condition regarding 'multiple models released at the same time':

    • 'At the same time' specifically means multiple new models appearing simultaneously when the creator loads their own Plus tier account.

    • Models released on the same day but not appearing as simultaneously new to the creator upon checking do not automatically trigger an N/A resolution.

    • In a scenario where a model with a 'stupid fucking name' and a non-stupid model are released on the same day (but not observed as simultaneously new by the creator), if the 'stupid fucking name' model is the 'next' one identified, the market would resolve YES.

      ^^^simultaneously = a reasonable like one hour period where webcache could be excuse instead

  • Update 2025-06-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated that GPT-5o is considered a stupid fucking name.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

Or are YES bettors expecting a non-GPT5 model to be released ~this month, followed by GPT-5 later this summer?

Would GPT-5o qualify as a stupid name?

Also, I disagree that "o5" is a non-stupid name but it's your market so you can define "stupid" however you want

@MichaelDickens Yes, GPT-5o would be a stupid fucking name.

Oh man, I became the second largest YES holder correctly predicting the o3 pro release on Tuesday, but didn't see the "plus tier only" provision… I feel scammed

@JonasVollmer It was in the description from the creation of the market. Title update was done by a moderator.

@TimothyBandors yeah I know :( I wish it was more salient from the beginning

What happens if GPT-5 is released and, on the same day, o3-pro (or some other model with a “stupid fucking name”) is made available to Plus tier?

@BrendanEREPh gpt-5 is not releasing along o3-pro being available in plus. gpt-5 is supposed to combine their model families into a single product.

@BrendanEREPh Resolves NO. Only NA if when I load my account, I see multiple models added at the same time. Same day does not equal same time

@256 source for “combine the model families”? hadn’t heard of that

@ThomasPoltoranos i made it up

@ThomasPoltoranos just kidding

@256 Thanks!

bought Ṁ150 NO

https://openai.com/de-DE/chatgpt/pricing/

German, Spanish, and Japanese pricing pages show o3-pro as a Pro, not a Plus model, so should not yet resolve as YES

@Soaffine Yep, I am not resolving until I see a new model on my own chatgpt.com plus tier account.

@TimothyBandors ive cashed out so i no longer have an incentive to convince you of anything, but may i ask, why did you add this condition in the first place? who cares if its on the pro tier instead of the plus tier?

@256 wft, this was not clarified when we bid on it, it's even available in the API. @Bayesian can you clarify if changing the resultion criteria like this should be tolerated?

@Phill afaict it was in the description since the start, a mod changed the title today to prevent confusion

@256 That’s right. This is fine, the title didn’t contain all the details but it often can’t

sold Ṁ433 YES

@Bayesian never mind, I'm regarded sorry, I did not read to the end, just saw the bot clarification description from today. guess I at least realized this early enough to get out cheaply

@256 I care because I want to see the stupid fucking name for the next model with my own stupid fucking eyes when I log into my stupid fucking chatgpt account.

@TimothyBandors that is a fittingly stupid fucking reason

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy