I would not have resolved to no here until the Fulton County DA's office finalizes the decision to keep Willis over Wade. The Court ruled that one has to go

@NathanWhite That would be a recusal not a removal

I am sad I didn't see these markets until today. I would have put it at 5% that the judge ruled to remove because the claim clearly didn't meet the evidentiary standards. Crazy high odds.

What's the reason for resolving NO, @BTE ?

@mint Did the court not rule?

More testimony possible about Fani Willis' alleged affair.

https://twitter.com/PhilHollowayEsq/status/1764753092896030989

If she steps aside voluntarily, how will this market resolve? Can you explain “be removed”?

@LeeBressler @BTE

@LeeBressler That would be YES. She is clearly not going to be doing that though because the decision is already with the judge.

A judge has determined that Nathan Wade’s former law partner and divorce lawyer must tell the court what he knows about the special prosecutor’s relationship with District Attorney Fani Willis.

https://twitter.com/ajc/status/1762264454593413345

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/new-cellphone-data-raises-questions-about-testimony-on-fani-willis-relationship

Nathan Wade visited DA Fani Willis' Georgia neighborhood at least 35 times and stayed overnight BEFORE she hired him as special prosecutor, cellphone data shows

@brianwang Talk about completely useless and irrelevant information. The pathetic desperation of Trump and his minions would be sad if it wasn’t also so hilarious.