For clarification, if a group is collectively awarded it, and Jack Smith is specifically mentioned as part of that group, this shall resolve YES.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,007 | |
| 2 | Ṁ199 | |
| 3 | Ṁ170 | |
| 4 | Ṁ126 | |
| 5 | Ṁ92 |
@BRTD We now know it will be announced tomorrow. Also, how does this resolve if the PotY is a group that Jack Smith is a part of?
@PlasmaBallin Yeah I was about to get to that. "Trump prosecutors" is a possibility. If so and he's specifically mention it would resolve YES.
@PlasmaBallin Not sure how it could resolve NO if he is one of multiple people selected.
My (play) money's on ChatGPT or AI, similar to "You" or "The Protester". This is the year it really started popping off.
Though I'm glad to see him face some actual consequences for once, I'm sick of hearing about Trump or his court cases. Jack Smith person of the year would be the liberal thirst for Robert Mueller all over again.