Will someone at a major AI company (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc) end up violating their non-disclosure agreement (NDA) by 2026?

Ṁ310Ṁ689

resolved Apr 21

Resolved

YES

ALL

Get

1,000

to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#	Trader	Total profit
1		Ṁ11
2		Ṁ8
3		Ṁ5
4		Ṁ5
5		Ṁ3

People are also trading

Will OpenAI stick to its commitment to the same red lines as Anthropic for the US military using its AI by EOY 2026?

70% chance

Will Anthropic, OpenAI and DeepMind voluntarily act in accordance with Trump’s executive order 14409 for all of 2026?

63% chance

Will an AI agent at OpenAI, Anthropic, or GDM hack one of the other two labs to steal its research before July 2027?

29% chance

Will OpenAI change its name by the end of 2026?

7% chance

Will OpenAI go public in 2026?

4% chance

Will a company lose ownership of an AI due to credible claims of the AI's possible sentience by the end of 2026?

8% chance

Will OpenAI announce that they are cooperating with Deepmind, Anthropic, Meta or Google in order to mitigate race dynamics by 2027?

54% chance

Will OpenAI, Anthropic or Google cut API access to their text models, in 2026?

7% chance

At the end of 2027 will both OpenAI and Anthropic be public companies?

81% chance

Will a major AI-related CEO or AI researcher be revealed to hire a food/microplastic taster for them by EOY 2028?

18% chance

Sort by:

I mean... https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-researchers-including-ally-of-sutskever-fired-for-alleged-leaking

This should already be resolved with the PaLM 2 parameter count leak, no? There is practically no way it could reach the media without someone violating NDA.

I doubt they have NDAs at those companies considering Anthropic was founded by a team inside OpenAI. They obviously did if they had NDAs and the lack of consequences probably means they don’t. They aren’t as popular in tech as they are in sandwich making these days (see Jimmy Johns).

Uh, should it have to be a notable violation? People tell things to friends, most of the time you wont hear about it, or the things they're disclosing aren't very consequential.