The question will be decided using my best judgment according to serious comments made by Destiny and Lav after the market closes. (Clippers welcome.) [26 Oct clarification] If there’s conflict in the meantime, but they mend it before Jan 31, it’ll resolve to “YES, the bridge is standing”.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ3,379 | |
| 2 | Ṁ909 | |
| 3 | Ṁ819 | |
| 4 | Ṁ361 | |
| 5 | Ṁ331 |
@GeorgeBarnacle While I have this shorted so I am coming from a privileged position, there is hope for you, perhaps the coomer brain will be so strong that the bridge is willed back into existence. Good luck, I love you.
@0o0 As I commented under the MrGirl bridge market, I’ll try hard to stick to the original description:
>Welp. I have regrets [about not preparing for more complicated outcomes], but it is what it is now. I plan to resolve the market cleanly, either as YES or NO, “using my best judgment according to serious comments made by Destiny and MrGirl after the market closes”. In other words, you have to metagame forecast if/how they react. If these criteria fail to provide an answer – I have some ideas, but for now, let’s keep them TBD.
@old_chicken I see the cons, but I’m sticking to the original description (with clarifications) – it’s going to be decided by the status on Jan 31. Until then, trade the volatility.
@yaboi69 two months is plenty of time for bridges to be rebuilt, although this one does seem annihilated. I think you're right to keep up the trade
@old_chicken oh i misunderstood. he said on melinas stream a few hours ago that lav will be back on stream in the upcoming week with a probability of 50%