"An Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling that frozen embryos in test tubes should be considered children has sent shock waves through the world of reproductive medicine, casting doubt over fertility care for would-be parents in the state and raising complex legal questions with implications extending far beyond Alabama."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/20/health/ivf-alabama-abortion.html
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ121 | |
| 2 | Ṁ115 | |
| 3 | Ṁ112 | |
| 4 | Ṁ93 | |
| 5 | Ṁ48 |
@Noah1 It's a good question and shows some sloppy drafting on my part. I think the right approach given the ambiguity though is to resolve YES even if it only partially resolves the effects of the holding (ex. is limited to IVF). If you or anyone else disagrees I'd be happy to hear that point though.
For context this ruling was narrow and it only directly effects Alabama's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act.
https://law.justia.com/codes/alabama/2022/title-6/chapter-5/article-22/section-6-5-391/