
resolves yes if someone uncovers evidence that indicates his run was cheated, staged, TAS, or manipulated in some way , verified as judged by me alongside public consensus

People are also trading
@strutheo Surely 'run' refers to the sub-two minute run in the Artificer's Pit, as referenced in the description
even then i dont see how this isnt 'not genuine'? he didnt play the account to that point, or hes on another account, he just did it to look like he broke the record when he clearly is not normally able to?
The screenshotted article starts with
"In an insane leap, Elon musk looks to have become the number one diablo 4 player in the world"
Being a highly ranked player was fake.
Evidence has come out showing he cheated:
https://kotaku.com/elon-musk-poe2-diablo-4-paid-boosting-fake-controversy-1851743670
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/102692/elon-musk-confirms-he-cheated-to-become-top-player-in-path-of-exile-2-and-diablo-iv/index.html
https://futurism.com/gamers-disgusted-musk-cheats-diablo-path-exile
How does this resolve if he exploited a bug?
Elon Musk's Diablo IV Build May Only Look Good Because He's Great At Exploiting Loopholes
@TimothyJohnson5c16 This is what speedruns are, right? Unless he advertised it as a glitchless run this seems fine. I've watched dozens of speedruns of people duping items or glitching through walls, it's how they get so fast.