resolves YES to all that are true at the end of the investigation
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ174 | |
| 2 | Ṁ28 | |
| 3 | Ṁ23 | |
| 4 | Ṁ21 | |
| 5 | Ṁ21 |
Joint DHS/FBI Statement on Reports of Drones in New Jersey | Homeland Security https://share.google/syKRynx5Hw5iydNlu
@TracyHarms im fine NAing the ' mistaken' option since there was also a lot of that, @mods can you handle? i am locked out
@strutheo Do whatever you think is right, I just won't take positions on your stuff if the epistemic standards are that low.
What's the resolution of "The drone sightings are mistaken (e.g. they’re planes)" if only like a couple of the sightings are something not mundane? Because it seems overwhelmingly obvious that the majority of sightings are mistaken (just passenger jets and mundane stuff), the question is if there's something behind at least a couple of the sightings. If it turns out the overwhelming majority of sightings are mistaken, but just one sighting was not, how will this resolve?
I don't actually think it's US military, but when I arbitraged to https://manifold.markets/10thOfficial/what-will-be-true-about-the-mystery this market sw
ung a whole lot further than that one.
