Skip to main content
RISK - Limit Order App
Ṁ0 tips

tldr

I added a limit order app to the website here: https://risk.markets/limits. It was inspired by this section of the FAQ. Give it a whirl.

View the full v2.1.4 release notes here. RISK is open source. Create an issue if you find bugs.

Scroll down to see screenshots.



Have a nice day.

And enjoy this picture of RICK the RISK raccoon relaxing after a long session of coding important internet tools.

Your website is down brother

The requested deployment does not exist. Deno Deploy Classic was sunset on July 20, 2026 and no longer serves deployments. See https://deno.com/deploy for the new Deno Deploy.

(edited)

edit 2: i added a feature: Advanced Mode. Requires API key entry. Toggle "Volatility Bet" on and you will see the new "Advanced Mode" toggle. Check it out.
edit: gif didn't work oops

(edited)

New Feature for Limit Order App: Volatility Betting + Multi Market Support

Multi Market Support:

(edited)

Very cool!
If you want more ideas - here's 2 that I want.

1) What limit orders to place for volatility trading (i.e. a market that continuously fluctuates between 35 - 45)

2) Arbitrage helper (user would input 2 markets that they believe should resolve the same or inversely. A more advanced version would be 3 markets that are correlated e.g. A resolves to the difference between B & C

@FergusArgyll

  1. Volatility Trading: To accomplish this, would it be good to do something like: place YES/NO at 39/41, 38/42, 37/43, 36/44, 35/45?

  2. Arbitrage Helper: User would enter two (or more) URLs and the app should do what exactly?

@crowlsyong

  1. Isn't there a question, how much to put at each end? if 3/10, yes on 3 makes a lot more than no on 10

  2. I don't know bec every time I attempt arbitrage I lose on both - no idea how. :( It should say how much to put on each direction on each question taking slippage into account I guess?

(edited)

@FergusArgyll

  1. I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. It sounds like you're acknowledging that betting YES on a market at say 30% will make a lot more mana than betting YES on a market at 60%, so long as the resolution is YES. Or in the case of a range, (say 35% to 45%), then to profit on the volatility, you will make the most mana by betting on the widest range (35% to 45% rather than 39% to 41%), however if betting on a range, you are also assuming that the market will in fact be volatile enough to fill those orders. So in order to make profits more likely, I'm saying that a set of bets could be placed throughout that range: So in the case of my previous example, you could be a large amount on 39/41, smaller bet on 38/42, smaller bet 37/43, smaller bet 36/44, smallest bet on 35/45. This way, if the market is less volatile than you imagined, you can still profit on smaller fluctuations. This seems doable and reasonable to me and I might just try and built it :)

  2. I'll put some thought into it...

@crowlsyong

That makes sense...

I've never really thought about either, I don't do much "day trading" or technical trading but I've recently wondered about it

(edited)

@FergusArgyll

adding this feature:

MANA would like to purchase your app for 10% shares of MANA. We will keep the app free but allow donations, of which you will get 75%

@100Anonymous ❤️ Not for sale but the code is open source with MIT license. I see you DM'd me as well, I'll continue the conversation there.