What do you think?
I like it! I think it might be good if the liquidity in each answer was combined for linked multi choice though? But not for unlinked multi
@digory To buy shares, somebody has to sell shares. If there are no bettors on the market, the AMM (Maniswap) sells shares. The amount of mana kept for the sale of AMM shares is liquidity. This is why you see a limit on how much you can bet without other traders. To maintain a balance of mana, if users make a net profit, the liquidity of the market creator is lost, and vice versa. This is also why probabilities move less for markets with higher liquidity: the current market price is more sustainable.
This is best explained with an example:
E.g. I create the market Will XXX happen by YYY with 1k mana subsidy. This means that, without other traders, the maximum profit you can make is 1000 mana, because no more mana exists to pay you if you can get a profit higher than 1k mana (no, creating mana is not a good idea. It causes too much inflation.) Any net profit must stay below 1000 mana. If for example, you bet 8888 mana before anyone else on no, If you win, you get 9888 mana on my market and my liquidity is gone; if it resolves yes I get 9888 mana back since your loss is returned to me (this does cause an incentive to mis-resolve markets, but it's not worth the ban and/or fine).