At market close, I will check steam live charts, ordered by current players. If Palworld is in rank 10 or better, resolves NO. Otherwise, resolves YES.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ169 | |
| 2 | Ṁ81 | |
| 3 | Ṁ68 | |
| 4 | Ṁ57 | |
| 5 | Ṁ28 |
People are also trading
@strutheo I chose that because i consider tf2 to be dead and it was around #10 when I checked. I wouldn't really call that dead either because of the non-dead games below that, but I think this market would be less meaningful if I cut off at like #120 or so, where I would actually call a game dead.
Maybe I could have chosen criteria based on player retention like % of peak players but i was too lazy to figure out what a good number for that is
With all that in mind, I probably should have chosen a different title but this one is a direct quote I've heard from a few different people, and I think those people would think it would be humiliating for Palworld if it soon had less players than tf2 or RUST (a direct competitor, also near #10)
@pkpr fair enough, i'd just be clear in the description. 'dead' can mean a lot of things to different people. and everyone uses 'dead game' as a meme so often
i still play tf2 occasionally </3 haha