🏅 Top traders

In this branch of the universe, the market resolves to No.

I used https://qrng.anu.edu.au/dice-throw/, recommended by Yudkowsky.

In another branch, a version of me saw "2" instead, and the market resolved to Yes.

Does this only work in Many Worlds or does one version of me get the payout under some other interpretations too?

@yaboi69 I trust Yudkowsky on this

@ms

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hc9Eg6erp6hk9bWhn/the-quantum-physics-sequence

@yaboi69 oh sorry read your comments incorrectly.

Yeah, I currently think the many worlds is closest to the truth, if there's some kind of a choice or a collapse, there's only one version of you and you're either lucky or not

Aren't all sources of randomness quantum?

@ZZZZZZ there are different kinds of randomness! I'll be using https://qrng.anu.edu.au/dice-throw/, recommended by Yudkoswky

@ms I guess if you used something like the nth digit of pi, it wouldn't be quantum randomness, but I think most reasonable sources of randomness will have a version of you that wins and one that loses but I guess not necessarily at a 1:1 ratio so if you want that then a quantum random source makes sense.

@ZZZZZZ with most sources of randomness that are not directly quantum, it's not literally "there will be two copies of you run by universe, one has won and another lost"

@ms well, it won't be exactly two either way but most random sources will have multiple universes created. Maybe not at the exact moment the random number is picked but at some point before that.

With what probability will you resolve YES/NO/N/A?

@TomShlomi You mean what is the chance that you are in the universe where this market is resolved YES?

@TomShlomi 50%/50%/0