Yes = Nick
No = Jakobokaj
I will resolve the market in favor of the side that has the higher percentage, which would be at least 51% for YES and 49% for NO.
Market closes at 2 P.M. PST. I will push the closing time further if the debate is still going on.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,492 | |
| 2 | Ṁ58 | |
| 3 | Ṁ52 | |
| 4 | Ṁ50 | |
| 5 | Ṁ43 |
Sorry people who lost mana on this, hopefully a valuable lesson that markets with these sorts of resolution criteria are easy to manipulate (compared to those which are tied to an event occurring).
@johnleoks we appreciate that you haven't broken any rules. As you know we are totally fine with market manipulation, although it would be great if you confined your manipulation to other people's markets rather than on your own where you have full control of the closing time and resolution.
@DavidChee I appreciate you pointing out that this is allowed so I'm not breaking any rules. From my end, as long people like Isaac makes the same gambling type markets and also bet on them, I will do the same, especially since they have the trustworthiness badge next to their names so that means I should be emulating them.
@johnleoks hmm I wasn't aware he was manipulating on his own markets as well. I'll tell him the same thing I told you next time I see it.
@DavidChee Lol what? Self-resolving markets have been a thing ever since the site existed; they're some of the most popular markets on the site, and you even promoted one for April Fool's. Why are they suddenly a problem now? I'm so confused.
@PunishedFurry Remember what Train always says, "don't get it twisted, you WILL lose".