🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ50 | |
2 | Ṁ31 | |
3 | Ṁ20 | |
4 | Ṁ19 | |
5 | Ṁ14 |
they are:
Sam tried to oust other board member(s)
Sam was "extremely good at becoming powerful", too often getting his way in various conflicts with the board. Past board members and employees who opposed him, on a variety of issues, were forced out. They wanted a less powerful CEO.
Sam tried to compromise the independence of the independent board members by sending an email to staff “reprimanding” Helen Toner https://archive.ph/snLmn
Interpersonal squabbles not related to AI safety
Disagreement around filling board vacancies
Told one too many little fibs/frequently dishonest about minor decisions/pathological liar
Literally no other reason other than habitual lying and dishonesty, topic irrelevant
Sam was more interested in creating products and development speed, others were more interested in nonprofit mission and safety
Misalignment with nonprofit mission
Sam wanted to add board member(s)
A power play with no straightforward case ever given by the board
The board caught him lying several times
Alignment coup
Fundamental disagreement about OpenAI's safety approach
Fundamental disagreement about OpenAI's safety approach (the board wanted more safety)
Samaa wanted to scale the current models they had and squeeze the max utility out of them, while Ilya et al think that this is hindering their AGI efforts.
Sam intended to start a new company before he left
Something related to Microsoft
Sam hasn’t been honest about technical stuff that was going on at OpenAI
Withholding Specific AI Project Developments or Outcomes from the Board