
options resolve n/a if debate doesn't happen
i'll try to put together a default 'what does it mean to say a word' edge case rule.
Submitters do not judge options, and submitter comment clarifications about meaning are not binding (because in past markets where they were, nobody saw the clarifications and it caused a lot of drama). Submitters should clarify within the option text itself.
Many of the submitted options are somwhat ambiguous. As this is a "fun" market, I'm choosing to leave them up and resolve them in the most reasonable way possible, but it's inevitable there will be some disagreement on some of them.
current specific rules about what it means to say something, which might change slightly: https://manifold.markets/jacksonpolack/first-trumpharris-debate-prop-bets#3lij3suv1uk
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ218,384 | |
2 | Ṁ13,952 | |
3 | Ṁ12,713 | |
4 | Ṁ9,891 | |
5 | Ṁ9,666 |