Resolves the same as this metaculus question: https://www.metaculus.com/questions/12257/aus-referendum-on-indigenous-voice-by-2026/
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ4,038 | |
| 2 | Ṁ3,639 | |
| 3 | Ṁ1,816 | |
| 4 | Ṁ756 | |
| 5 | Ṁ380 |
@galen As I’m sure you’re aware, the referendum has happened. Would you mind resolving this?
@Gabrielle Sorry about the short delay with my resolution on this! I had in mind that my note in the description saying "Resolves the same as this metaculus question" would be interpreted as "I will resolve this after (& in the direction of) the metaculus resolution".
The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, confirmed the voice to parliament referendum will be held between October and December, most likely early October.
Albanese has announced that a referendum will occur before 2023, so this will very likely be YES.
@TomShlomi I agree! At the time that I subsidised the liquidity, I wasn’t expecting that it would stay so outsized relative to other markets.
@SG This is so confusing to me! I added liquidity to this when I created it, because it’s interesting and decision-relevant to people I know. From my perspective, I was trying to incentivise more accurate & active trading. I’m surprised other users haven’t done this more!
@SG Pay for information that’s valuable to you, people! It’s it hard to do, and it gives you bonus warm fuzzy feelings!
@galen I will be re-introducing 3rd party subsidization soon (and making more prominent in the UI).