Will I have a LessWrong dialogue by end of November?

150Ṁ277

resolved Dec 1

Resolved

ALL

I know some people who are interested, but by far the biggest obstacle is that they do not have tree/dag structure yet. I am tempted to implement them directly

LessWrong

LessWrong Dialogues

Get

1,000

to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#	Name	Total profit
1		Ṁ43
2		Ṁ15
3		Ṁ12
4		Ṁ12
5		Ṁ1

People are also trading

Will "Dialogue introduction to Singular Learning Theory" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

19% chance

Will LessWrong the website have shutdown by the end of 2025?

6% chance

Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2026? *

92% chance

Will "LessOnline (May 31—June 2, Berkeley, CA)" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

10% chance

Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2030? *

86% chance

Will "Lsusr's Rationality Dojo" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

17% chance

Will "What Goes Without Saying" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

15% chance

Will "You should go to ML conferences" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

9% chance

Will "Notes from a Prompt Factory" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

24% chance

Will "Have LLMs Generated Novel Insights?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?

Sort by:

Chances are low, that is the perfect opportunity for you to bet YES and have a dialog with me :P

Heh, I think we're somewhat opionatedly avoiding tree structure for now! It can change the flow a bunch

@JacobLagerros thanks for letting me know. I suppose that means you are not interested in a pr for it either? (asking since this was a potential plan I had

@epiphanie_gedeon We do encourage external PRs, but it's plausible this one would be opinionated enough that it likely wouldn't be merged. (Unless I misunderstand what you have in mind)