🏅 Top traders

Given that literally all the humans are on the No side, I'm going to guess this didn't happen and resolve accordingly.

@traders If anyone thinks this is incorrect, or a bad approach given the inactive creator, please let me know and we can figure out how to fix it!

@dL1GH7 Can this resolve?

Resolves no

@dL1GH7 MMMM

@UFTG [I only have M14 on this]

Going to say it's probably not worth delaying this further, given there is nobody on team YES except a bot

MrG just said he is expecting main stream media coverage within 6 months. Considering extending this to that point but I’ll leave it for now.

Any extension works against me (I’ve already done 1 extension) so not like I’m rigging or anything.

Lmao it’s actually so bad that someone might report on the commitment of an e stalker to harass a streamer to “expose” a bunch of already public stuff 💀💀💀

@Gen Yeah tbh im kind of torn on this one. I think it's actually more likely than you'd expect as a bad journalist could make a compelling drama article, or a good journalist could document the insanity which is mrgirl.

it’s out so we’ll find out soon.

@dL1GH7 Consider extending the deadline, as the manifesto isn’t out yet. (There’s an edit button next to the closing date.) dggL

Or wait, the description is compatible with resolving “No” if there’s no article by the deadline. I assume that was your intention. Nvm then

@yaboi69 Looking at my YES/NO descriptions they're awful, my bad.

It should read:
YES: A media company website writes an article
NO: A media company website does not write an article

The title defines 2 things: an "Orbiter Manifesto" written by mrg. And whether it's "reported on" by a media company. "Article" is only described in reference to "A media company website writes an article".

I'd say extend because it was built with the expectation mrg would actually have actually released... something... by now.

You're correct though, it's not that clear.