100
937
6.4K
resolved Apr 9
100%99.6%
(1) UConn
0.0%
(1) Houston
0.0%
(1) North Carolina
0.0%
(1) Purdue
0.0%
(2) Iowa State
0.0%
(2) Marquette
0.0%
(2) Arizona
0.0%
(2) Tennessee
0.0%
(3) Illinois
0.0%
(3) Kentucky
0.0%
(3) Baylor
0.0%
(3) Creighton
0.0%
(4) Auburn
0.0%
(4) Duke
0.0%
(4) Alabama
0.0%
(4) Kansas
0.0%
(5) Saint Mary's
0.0%
(5) Gonzaga
0.0%
(5) San Diego State
0.0%
(5) Wisconsin

Teams are formatted as (Seed) (Team).

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ6,699
2Ṁ2,329
3Ṁ955
4Ṁ232
5Ṁ219
Sort by:
sold Ṁ5,001 (4) Alabama NO

chat please i need 100 traders

hey @cece I approve of your market, it’s democratic. Why should only NCAA know-it-alls get to participate in March Madness? There are bazillion markets for them already. Now kindly help out a numerate person who knows as much about US college sports as they do about cricket which is to say, zilch (me) and please resolve to No the teams who have lost.

sold Ṁ14 (1) Houston YES

@ClubmasterTransparent you can't resolve individual answers in a dependent market

@StopPunting Ha joke’s on me then.

Thank you for being the one market creator for the "Who'll win?" markets to simultaneously (1) add ALL 64 teams, and (2) add the seed numbers!

@PaintspotInfez makes it easier for less invested bettors to still make educated bets—glad i could help

For the personal fans

The road goes on forever and the party never ends

bought Ṁ6 (4) Duke YES

may also be interested in cinderellas in the sweet 16: https://manifold.markets/wilsonkime/how-many-nonpower-conference-teams

bought Ṁ10 (1) UConn YES

@strutheo oh i didn't see this! that's my bad (but arbitrage opportunity ig)

bought Ṁ5,000 Other NO

it's basically free mana to bet no on seeds 10 and lower (i'm losing ~1.5K mana through this market please help fund my future poor betting decisions)

bought Ṁ1 (6) BYU YES

@cece Finders keepers losers weepers! Unfair to ME to N/A it now.