Would the Wikipedia page about LK-99 be longer than 80,000 bytes at end of September?
5
closes Sep 30
47%
chance

The Wikipedia page is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99, revision history at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LK-99&action=history

From August 19th, it has been consistenly above 80k bytes, until a user named AncientWalrus deleted 2k bytes on September 8th, bringing it down to 78,940 bytes, with a reason of:

Remove author/contribution/acknowledgement matrix as it is Original Research and not very essential for a discussion of the subject of this article, the compound LK-99

Would the Wikipedia page about LK-99 be longer than 80,000 bytes at end of September? The length at November 1st, 12:00am, UTC time, will be used.

Troll edits do count.

Get Ṁ500 play money

Related questions

Table of contents of Nature will mention LK-99 through September
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
19% chance
Arxiv will have at least 10 papers mentioning LK-99 or LK99 in September 2023
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
9% chance
Will 60 Minutes do a full segment on LK-99 on CBS in the month of August or September 2023
BradBooker avatarBrad Booker
9% chance
Will any of the original 7 LK-99 researchers speak at an international conference in 2023?
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
21% chance
AUDIO from the alleged talk on LK-99 given by Prof Kwon is released through Sep 2023
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
4% chance
LK-99 will be added to Wikipedia's list of scientific errors and frauds before 2025
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
38% chance
Will LK-99 be proven to be diamagnetic in 2023?
AvaHowell avatarAva Howell
75% chance
Conditional on replication in 2023, will an LK-99 superconductor replication later be found to have been spurious?
CKLorentzen avatarCK Lorentzen
39% chance
Conditional on LK-99 replicating, will a RTSC be used commercially by 2026?
Paul avatarPaul
57% chance
Arxiv will have at least 10 papers mentioning LK-99 or LK99 from September through the end of the year
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
60% chance
Will any of the original 7 LK-99 researchers speak at an international conference through 2024
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
54% chance
Table of contents of Nature will mention LK-99 through 2023
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
23% chance
Will the number of published papers on LK-99 or similar derivatives exceed 300 before 2027?
Tater avatarTater
13% chance
Will we discover empirical results in the LK-99 papers were fake by the end of the year?
lydia avatarlydia
17% chance
LK-99 will be added to Wikipedia's page on pathological science before 2025
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
23% chance
Arxiv will have at least 50 papers mentioning LK-99 or LK99 published in 2024
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
25% chance
Arxiv will have at least 10 papers mentioning LK-99 or LK99 published in 2024
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
61% chance
Table of contents of Nature will mention LK-99 through 2024
StrayClimb avatarCalvinball
34% chance
Will LK-99 be used in any commercial application before 2030?
JonathanRay avatarJonathan Ray
17% chance
Will I be able to purchase LK-99 by the end of 2023?
Sodra avatarSodra
15% chance
Sort by:
jameso avatar
james o

Why not use the length at a random time on November 1st in order to reduce ability to rig the result?

bohaska avatar
Bohaska

An edit by Pyraminxsolver added 404 bytes to the article, it's now 79,344 bytes.

However, IMO the edit doesn't look like it fits Wikipedia's guidelines.

The added content: An upcoming paper by one of the original researchers claims that it will be the complete version and that it would verify LK-99's alleged superconductivity.