Not retaliating rewarded (Trump tariffs)
2
100Ṁ20
Dec 31
59%
chance

Countries reacted to Trump's tariffs in a variety of ways, with some (like Canada and China) imposing reciprocal tariffs while others (like Australia and New Zealand) deciding to not.

This market seeks to predict whether countries that "don't retaliate" by imposing reciprocal tariffs face, on average, lower tariffs on U.S. imports (compared to Liberation Day / trade balance baselines) than ones that do.

  • RESOLVES "YES" IF NOT RETALIATING LEADS TO LOWER TARIFFS

  • RESOLVES "NO" IF IT LEADS TO HIGHER TARIFFS

  • RESOLVES "N/A" IF DIFFERENCE IS NOT SIGNIFICANT

In essence, whether retaliation is effective or not in Trump's Liberation Day trade war.

The calculation will be done as such:

Countries will be classified according to "Yes reciprocal tariffs" and "No reciprocal tariffs", and the average change in % of tariffs (difference in December from Liberation Day) will be calculated for the two groups (as close to December 1st, 2025 as possible).

Caveats: this is agnostic to alliances, economy size, and retaliation size - in order to make the calculation simple. Canada and Mexico will be calculated according to their pre-Liberation Day Trump Tariff baseline, as those Trump tariffs were made beforehand. China will also be included.

I may decide to default to a comprehensive report from a trusted source if available. I will try to use latest estimates for tariff %s in so far as they are available. I may decide to change the way the calculations are done to better reflect the spirit of the question (if there is enough interest in the market), or in order to make it easier with the available data (if there isn't). I may decide to defer until enough data or a good report is available if I don't have the time.

I will not be betting on this market.

  • Update 2025-04-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Threshold for resolution: The average tariff difference between non-retaliating and retaliating countries must exceed 1% to resolve YES.

    • Statistical tests (optional): If the market gains traction, the creator may perform significance calculations (e.g., p < .10 or p < .05) and report them, but the 1% rule applies by default.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

Does the difference have to be significant in any way or will any difference in average tariff in the right direction resolve YES? E.g. would 11% vs 11.1% resolve yes?

Good question. Difference must be greater than 1% as a rule.

If the market gets traction, I will do significance calculations to some appropriate p value that would be mentionable in appropriate areas (e.g. p < .10 or p < 0.05)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy