MANIFOLD
Do I need to RTFB AB 3211?
12
Ṁ1kṀ9k
resolved Jul 30
Resolved
YES

Resolves to YES if I do read the bill and conclude I needed to do that.

Resolves to NO if I do read the bill and conclude I didn't need to do that, or read it sufficiently to conclude I can stop.

Resolves to 'fair market percent' (as in common sense cheating defenses enabled) if I choose not to read the bill.

For reference, see: https://www.understandingai.org/p/california-should-rethink-its-broad

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ437
2Ṁ152
3Ṁ88
4Ṁ44
5Ṁ44
Sort by:

https://thezvi.substack.com/p/rtfb-californias-ab-3211 for the resulting post.

It's a bad bill, sir.

RTFB: California's AB 3211
Some in the tech industry decided now was the time to raise alarm about AB 3211.

So you read it! Will you write a blog post about it?

Opportunity to buy No then publish a very high quality summary!

Are we scaling “need” to bill length, or is it an absolute threshold? Way shorter than EU AI Act for example

Amount of need scales with cost of doing it, yes. Obviously it needs to be a lot less important than reading the EU AI Act to count.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.•Terms•Privacy